Multiple factors have been studied to analyze whether they could affect the person's sexual orientation. Some of these factors include parenting styles, genetic origins, childhood sexual experiences, hormonal origins, mental health, conversion therapy, and religious perspectives.
People who are lesbian, gay, or bisexual come in various shapes, sizes, and colors just like heterosexual people. Being gay, lesbian, or bisexual is not the same thing as being transgender. Most gay, lesbian, and bisexual people are comfortable with their own biological sex; they don't consider themselves as members of the opposite sex. Regardless of origin, it is about that time where homosexual people are given equal rights.
There continues to be debate by scientist, religious leaders, elected officials, and the general public on whether sexual orientation is a trait you are born with or if its caused by the environment we are raised in.
Society, with some rare exceptions, are socialized to be heterosexual. Despite this socialization into heterosexual patterns, some research has showed that the behavioral patterns of homosexuals suggest that is biologically based and that sexual orientation itself is also derived biologically.
The Associate Director at the University of Maryland LGBT Equity Center, Nicholas Sakurai, and the Coordinator, Calvin Sweeney, were able to take some time and answer a few questions I had regarding sexual orientation. The only question I had for both of them was their opinion on whether the origin or sexual orientation was nature or nurture. I chose to ask both of them this question because I think it's important to hear more then one opinion about the origin of homosexuality.
Both Sakurai and Sweeney has similar responses, neither gave a direct answer or thought the question was relevant. This is key because people are so concerned on whether the determinant is nature or nurture that its obsurity is affecting the real problem here, human rights. Regardless of the origin of sexual orientation, it is about that time where the LGBT community is given equal rights.
One of the strongest arguments risen regarding sexual orientation is whether it is determined by biological factors like genes and hormones.
One study conducted was the 2006 Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, which reported that having older biological brothers play a role in determining male sexual orientation. The results of this study conclude that the odds of being gay increase by 33% with each older male sibling. A second study was done after to see if this applied to homosexual women. Table 1 shows the mean number of siblings for the four groups. Homosexual men had more older brothers than heterosexual men did, but homosexual women did not differ from the heterosexual women with regard to any class of sibling.
One study conducted was the 2006 Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, which reported that having older biological brothers play a role in determining male sexual orientation. The results of this study conclude that the odds of being gay increase by 33% with each older male sibling. A second study was done after to see if this applied to homosexual women. Table 1 shows the mean number of siblings for the four groups. Homosexual men had more older brothers than heterosexual men did, but homosexual women did not differ from the heterosexual women with regard to any class of sibling.
This next graphic demonstrates the relationship between the number of older brothers with percentage of homosexuals. The numbers in parenthesis show how many of the 610 men who participated in the study had zero, one, two, and more then three brothers. For example, 60% of the 416 male participants with no older brothers were homosexual.
These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the high birth order of homosexual men reflects the progressive immunization of certain mothers H-Y antigen and the increasing effects of H-Y antibodies on sexual differentiation of the brain in succeeding male fetus. The fact that the maternal immune hypothesis survived the study does not mean that it has now been proven. There could be various alternative explanations like sex play between boys, increasing the likelihood of adult homosexuality.
The variation between men and women with these results makes it difficult to derive a solid conclusion about sexual orientation.
These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the high birth order of homosexual men reflects the progressive immunization of certain mothers H-Y antigen and the increasing effects of H-Y antibodies on sexual differentiation of the brain in succeeding male fetus. The fact that the maternal immune hypothesis survived the study does not mean that it has now been proven. There could be various alternative explanations like sex play between boys, increasing the likelihood of adult homosexuality.
The variation between men and women with these results makes it difficult to derive a solid conclusion about sexual orientation.
This study makes it apparent that having an older male sibling increases the likelihood of being a homosexual, but it doesn't apply to women. This study just further proves that there are differences between homosexual men and women, just like there are between heterosexual men and women, and homosexual and heterosexual people in general.
People argue that there are actual differences in the brain between homosexuals and heterosexuals, to justify why heterosexuals differ from homosexuals. Sakurai began responding to this by saying he is no expert in brain structure, but referred back to the brains of males and females. There are differences in the brain between males and females while still overlapping in some areas, but brain differences won't solve any problems regarding the rights of homosexuals.
Chandler Burr, another researcher, wrote the book on the right, in search for the genetic origin of sexual orientation. He believes in the theory called the Eve Principle of Harvard Researcher, Richard Pillard, where a "gay gene" in humans is the origin of homosexuality. He makes in interesting hypothesis that without male hormones, we'd all be women, regardless of whether we are XX or XY chromosome.
According to Pillard, the process of becoming a male means that the body must become defeminized and masculinized (including the brain). If the main difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is the orientation of sexual feelings towards others, then the brain needs to be involved. In male homosexuals, the brain is biologically masculinized but not defeminized in terms of orientation of sexual feelings towards others. Pillard says that The Mullerian Inhibiting Hormone (MIH), does its job in the body but not the brain.
Another researcher, Bruce Bagemihl, wrote a book in 1999 called Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity. In his study, he estimated that about 20% of all interactions of birds and mammals are homosexual. Through this evidence one can conclude that sexuality is common is a wide variety of species. Multiple hypothesis' have been tested, but the varied results through biological determinants still leave the question unresolved.